Statin Drugs for Children...A Disgrace...
Earlier this month the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a news release recommending that all children from age 2 be screened for cholesterol, and children from age 8 onwards be given medication to lower their cholesterol if it is elevated!!!!
We all know that they are referring to statin drugs. To see their news release click here.
This is unbelievable!
I am aware that Big Pharma is moving into difficult times as they have not been able to develop any new innovative block buster drugs for many years now and many of their big earners are due to come of patent soon.
But, this is really over the top!
Some will argue that the pharmaceutical company’s had nothing to do with this new ‘recommendation’…but those who truly believe that are being naïve to the extreme. I have no doubt that if the decision for the AAP to recommend this approach was followed all the way back to the inception of the idea that there will be a drug company and money involved somewhere down the line.
The report and recommendations was published by Stephen R. Daniels, MD, PhD and the Committee on Nutrition in the Pediatrics journal. Maybe it is just a coincidence that he has or had financial ties to Merck and Abbot Laboratories, two of the largest statin drug manufacturers in the world!!!
This recommendation will put Pediatricians in a very difficult position. Because the recommendation comes from an official body (AAP) then what happens if they do NOT prescribe a statin drug when a child is 8 years old and then in later years that child develops cardiovascular disease? Will that Pediatrician face a law suit?
Will some Pediatricians prescribe these drugs knowing that they have the potential to cause serious harm in later life but feel that they have to in order to protect themselves from potential law suits? After all they cannot be sued even if serious damage is done to the patient as a result of the drugs…provided that they did it by the book…in other words follow the recommendations of the AAP.
This is another example of how the pharmaceutical companies operate and how they apply part of their massive marketing budget of 35% of their gross sales to influence Doctors and decision makers in key positions to bring about such official recommendations.
What is going to happen when parents refuse to give the drugs to their 8 year old? Are they going to end up in court? Because there will be many thinking parents who will refuse and so they should.
Where is the evidence to prove the real benefits of statins in adults let alone children?
The cholesterol levels that the AAP is proposing at which a child will be considered as having elevated cholesterol and thus a candidate for a statin is crazy. And as for this nonsense about having 2 year olds screened for cholesterol levels…what a waste of resources!
In some parts of the world where levels of cholesterol has been tested in young children is has been found that that it is normal for it to elevated when they are young and is part of the development phase at that age and normalizes as they become young adults.
What is going to happen in later life if drugs are allowed to be introduced into a child’s body at that age? What impact will it have on the normal development of that child?
No one knows! Not the AAP nor the drug companies…and I doubt that they really care.
Money speaks!!!
Reader Comments (23)
I agree that this is dangerous and silly. In fact, I just read an article about how raised cholesterol in children is not very representative. However, all of this reminds me of Total Balance for Children - although it is of a different nature.
July 14, 2008 | keepitsimple
Hmmmm...I think that you are comparing apples with oranges here, :)
July 15, 2008 | Warren Matthews
Warren,
Nothing the big corporations do shocks me any more. People need to be aware of what these large corporations are doing, and the influence they have in our culture, our regulators and our legislators.
I had an experience in my doctors office a couple of years ago that truly enlightened me. I had a routine physical including a cholesterol check and the doctor came back and informed me that I just crossed the threshold into the range that the AMA recommends statins. I looked at my numbers and they where nearly the same as my previous physical, Actually they haven’t changed significantly in the last ten years. I asked the doctor why I was ok last year and this year I’m in the range where drug intervention would be required. He told me that the AMA recently lowered the threshold for what is considered a normal cholesterol level. At that moment I came to realize that the “tail is wagging the dog”. The drug companies are out of control, they are on a mission to get as much of the population on prescription medication as they can get. And now it looks like our children are on their radar screens. How Sad...
July 15, 2008 | Peter S.
Hi Peter,
The reason for the change is because the Cholesterol Council of America changed their recommendations. Interestingly 9 ofthe 12 members have financial ties with the statin drug manufacturers.
It puts Doctors in a very difficult position because it means they have to either go with the recommendations or run the risk of a potential malpractice suit.
The system is totally corrupt.
July 15, 2008 | Warren Matthews
Hi Warren,
I don't know how to contact you directly, so I'll use this blog. I know you've done comparisons between Total Balance and other products and I hope you will consider doing one for Fish Oil too.
It's a choice between Xtend-Life and the Life Extension Foundation. LEF is a respected nonprofit organization that has been around for the last thirty years. I'm confident that either product will be more than adequate, but I'd like to make as much of an informed decision as I can. Anyway, the link to the LEF product is here: http://www.lef.org/newshop/items/item00982.html More details are here: http://www.lef.org/Vitamins-Supplements/Top10/Omega-3-Fish-Oil.htm
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
If you wish to contact me privately, use this: turbid@(NOSPAM)myway.com
BTW: What's up with all the covert marketing websites for Xtend-Life? For example: http://www.nutritional-supplement-truths.com/Total-Balance.html and http://www.best-fish-oil-dietary-supplements.com/
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
Moreover, the titles are kind of long: http://www.nutritional-supplement-guides.com/what-we-use.html or http://www.safemenopausesolutions.com/vitamins-for-men.html Tell this Dan affiliate to ease up on that.
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
It's crazy how long these titles are: http://www.nutritional-supplements-health-guide.com/nutritional-health-
supplements.html I just can't get over that!
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
There needs to be some more creativity. I mean come on: http://www.omega3-health-guide.com/
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
OMG, just how many fake, independent looking websites did Xtend-Life create? Setting up million fake outside sources does not confer more credibility. Studies do. I just came across another one: http://www.omega-3-fish-oil-guide.com/ I'm not going to even bother to keep posting these because I would be up all night.
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
Like most manufacturers we have affliates...in fact we have thousands of them. They have their own websites and we have no input into what they do. They are not covert and we do NOT set up 'fake' websites.
We only have two websites. Our main one and another one www.omega3dha.com which is clearly ours. The subdomains preceding xtend-life are to help with tracking of affiliates and none of them are promoted by us.
We do not have the time and resources to monitor all the activties of our affiliate. All of them have to link to our website as we do not allow any of them to sell the product direct themselves. This way ensures that customers always visit the main website so they can recheck anything that they may have seen on any affiliate websites.
There is no difficulty in contacting me directly. Simply use the contact Warren link on this blog. That goes to one of our staff and if someone requests their email be forwarded to me personally for review it then is.
Please don't jump to conclusions like you tend to do.
July 15, 2008 | Warren Matthews
With regard to LEF they are a good organization and before we developed our own products I used to be a customer of theirs.
As a matter of fact their Life Extension Mix was a bench mark which our formulators used in developing Total Balance. Their brief was to develop something even better.
Over the years this has been acheived.
We will be doing a direct comparision shortly but on the new generation of Total Balance which will be released next month. There is a lot of work in doing these comparisions accurately so there is no point in doing it when the current version will soon be replaced.
Give me a reminder around the end of August. Thanks
July 15, 2008 | Warren Matthews
Hi Warren,
Yes, I realize you have affiliates (which you can't control) and I went too far in calling them fake websites designed to confer outside credibility. It just annoyed me that they had such a predictable design and often pretended to be completely impartial. However, I don't think I often jumped to conclusions. I've been skeptical but that's all.
Anyway, I'm not actually interested in a comparison between the LEF Mix and Total Balance. I'm only trying to decide on a good fish oil supplement at the moment. I don't trust the quality of many supplement companies and it takes a lot of work for me to be assured enough to add one. So far, the list is LEF, AOR (Ortho-Core if you want to add it to the comparrison), and USANA. I will probably add Xtend-Life in the near future. These aren't necessarily the only companies with quality supplements; just the ones I'm reasonably sure about.
So far, I'm leaning towards LEF's Fish Oil partly due to its additional synergistic nutrients but mostly because they have a certified 5 star rating on the IFOS list (http://www.nutrasource.ca/ifos_new/index.asp?section=ifosconsumer
&ifossection=5%20Star%20Rating%20Reports) which is stricter than the WHO and CRN standards. Although I can't find them on the EDF list (http://www.edf.org/page.cfm?tagID=16536) or ConsumerLabs. Anyway, I have some impartial outside guarantee of their quality in addition to their reputation. Moreover On the other hand, Xtend-Life's Fish Oil is in ester form. There doesn't seem to be a clear answer.
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
I should edit before posting. :)
July 15, 2008 | keepitsimple
I wouldn't put to much faith in the IFOS list. Like Consumerlab they are very much a 'for profit' organization. We considered listing our Omega 3 with them a few years ago when they got started but decided against it when they refused to answer one simple and very important question.
This related to their testing methodology for Dioxins. You can see the gist of that question at
http://www.xtend-life.com/product/Omega_3_~_DHA_Esters/Specifications+and+COA.aspx
Their standards are not that much tougher than the CRN as you will see from the chart on that page. They are certainly nowhere near as tough as our own self imposed specifications.
With regard to ester and triglyceride forms of fish oil there is a lot of misinformation around about this.
When a fish oil is concentrated it has to be changed to an ester form which is what the body does. Therefore it is more bio-available than a triglyceride form as there is one less process the body has to go through in order to utilize the oil.
However, some manufacturers convert the esters back to triglycerides because they perceive that is what the market wants. That would be OK if it was returned back to the natural triglyceride form...but, it is not. The process does not allow that. The position of some of the carbon bonds are changed on the backbone...hence it is an unnatural form.
In my opinion you should only take the triglyceride form if the oil has not been concentrated. If it has been concentrated, take the ester form. Bear in mind that if it is not concentrated very likely it has not been molecuarly distilled so you run the risk of contaminants.
If it has been distilled you have to make sure that it was not done using the cheapest process which involved hexane instead of ethanol.
Hope this helps.
July 16, 2008 | Warren Matthews
Thanks, it seems like Xtend-Life has its own advantages. Just a note "They are certainly nowhere near as tough as our own self imposed specifications." Yes, but how can I objectively verify your standards if not by outside means? Unlike for Total Balance which I understand may be too complicated for most of these testing bodies, it CAN be tested and this would sway me much more. Although I understand that perhaps IFOS and almost all standards organizations have some self-interest Any comments on the synergistic nutrients listed? As for the molecular distillation, they claim to use an improved process but I don't know the technical details and whether it's hexane (not hexanol?) or ethanol: "While most fish oil is distilled to decrease contaminants such as mercury and PCBs, the Super Refined® fish oil used in Super Omega-3 is produced with a patented method that purifies the oil with an intense two-step distillation process to reduce pollutants to virtually undetectable levels."
July 16, 2008 | keepitsimple
And just as a note, I'm getting really fed up with all the "Super" in their marketing. Does Superman take this stuff? :P
July 16, 2008 | keepitsimple
Speaking of statings, my dad is on Zocor at the lowest dose. If he were to take Total Balance, would there be any negative interactions? Moreover, if he were to try your cholesterol formula, what is the procedure to take? I don't want him to be exposed to undue risk if not on Zocor. Should he have a blood test first?
July 16, 2008 | keepitsimple
I really don't put a lot of credence in the claim for a unique patented molecular distillation process that they refer to for their Super Omega 3.
They use the sesame oil as a preservative instead of the natural Vitamin E that we use. I can't quite follow the logic of adding the olive oil. I think that it is a marketing gimmic more than anything. Most of us get plenty of Omega 6 during our diet and if we are eating a reasonable diet we should be getting our share of olive oil.
At the end of the day whole cold pressed olive oil is just that, natural olive oil and of course it naturally contains polyphenols.
But, having said that I would think that it is a quality product and I would not have a problem taking it myself if we did not have an oil.
With regard to authenticating our COA's we are working towards setting up a system where we will post the results of testing on the website from an independent government GMP approved laboratory. It is on the priority list but will still be a few months away.
July 16, 2008 | Warren Matthews
There is no problem with your Dad taking Zocor with Total Balance.
If he decides to try our Cholest-Natural he should defintely get a blood test first. Then he should use the Cholest-Natural for a month with the Zocor and then tell his Doctor that he wants to cut the dose back by 1/3rd for a month, then another 1/3rd for the next month at the end of which he should have another blood test.
Bear in mind that his cholesterol levels will spike after he goes off the statin. You should also have him check his triglycerides, homocysteine and C-Reactive Protein. Then the big picture can be looked at and monitored.
July 16, 2008 | Warren Matthews
"It is on the priority list but will still be a few months away."
This would be a big help for me. Everything you say sounds great but I want to verify it and this would go towards that.
Anyway, I'll see how open he is to switching from Zocor but first I will try to help him on the basics.
July 16, 2008 | keepitsimple
Also, while he is still on the statin, do you recommend any CoQ10 product in particular. I was considering LEF's but I'm not sure if it's necessary if he were to take the full dose of TB. I understand that it would elevate CoQ10 production - but then again, the statin might shut down the normal pathway.
July 16, 2008 | keepitsimple
Yes, the statin does shut down the normal pathway of CoQ10 production so the Total Balance will not help replenish this.
In the new generation of TB we have included CoQ10 to help those people whose production is impaired for various reasons including by statins. However, we do have adequate CoQ10 in our Cardio-Klenz to offset the effect of the statin. It also has cholesterol lowering properties as well.
By the way I emailed you personally so you could send me your Dad's blood test results.
If you don't use our Cardio-Klenz then a good quality CoQ10 supplement is critical.
July 16, 2008 | Warren Matthews
Hey Keepitsimple,
I have already done a comparison of both fish oils( at least on myself). After trying both I decided to stick with the Xtend-Life Formula when I finish the LE version. What I like about the Xtend Life version was that it comes from one source...LE does not. They say that when you have too many sources that some oils can become rancid lose potency. There are 3 sources in the LE version. I do know that they do carry out rigorous distillation on the oils they manufacture, so I guess that helps. I'm almost done with the bottle now, and I can tell you that it makes me constipated at least a few times during the week.
As for the Xtend-Life version, I did notice an improvement in things like the sheen of my hair and the strength of my nails. It did not make me constipated at all which was a plus:-) I also found that it did compliment the Total Balance very well. In other words, I felt better taking them together than just taking the Total Balance alone.
Hope this helps a little...
Thanks,
Alex
July 20, 2008 | Alex M

Reader Comments (0)